Inconsistency in Shoulder Arthrometers for Measuring Glenohumeral Joint Laxity: A Systematic Review.

There is no consensus on how to measure shoulder joint laxity and results reported in the literature are not well systematized for the available shoulder arthrometer devices. This systematic review aims to summarize the results of currently available shoulder arthrometers for measuring glenohumeral laxity in individuals with healthy or injured shoulders. Searches were conducted on the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases to identify studies that measure glenohumeral laxity with arthrometer-assisted assessment. The mean and standard deviations of the laxity measurement from each study were compared based on the type of population and arthrometer used. Data were organized according to the testing characteristics. A total of 23 studies were included and comprised 1162 shoulders. Populations were divided into 401 healthy individuals, 278 athletes with asymptomatic shoulder, and 134 individuals with symptomatic shoulder. Sensors were the most used method for measuring glenohumeral laxity and stiffness. Most arthrometers applied an external force to the humeral head or superior humerus by a manual-assisted mechanism. Glenohumeral laxity and stiffness were mostly assessed in the sagittal plane. There is substantial heterogeneity in glenohumeral laxity values that is mostly related to the arthrometer used and the testing conditions. This variability can lead to inconsistent results and influence the diagnosis and treatment decision-making.

Improved Clinical Outcomes After Lateralized Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has emerged as an attempt to improve on some of the drawbacks of conventional RSA, such as glenoid notching and decrease in ROM. Although this new design is being used in clinical practice, the evidence is mostly limited to case series and has not been systematically reviewed. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How much did patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ROM improve among patients who receive a lateralized RSA implant? (2) What proportion of shoulders experience complications, revision surgery, or scapular notching? METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from database inception to January 31, 2020. We included clinical studies that reported the PROMs and/or ROM of patients with insufficient rotator cuffs undergoing RSA with a lateralized implant. All other types of studies and those including patients with fractures, instability or escape, infection, rheumatologic disease, neurologic disease, or revision surgeries as an indication for RSA were excluded. PROMs and ROM were collected and are reported as mean values and ranges. Complications, revision surgery, and scapular notching are presented as proportions. The percentage of the mean change relative to the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated using the anchor-based value for each outcome. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess study quality. The initial search yielded 678 studies; 61 full-text articles were analyzed according to our eligibility criteria. After a detailed analysis, we included nine studies that evaluated 1670 patients (68% of whom [1130] were women) with a mean age of 71.8 ± 0.6 years. The mean follow-up period was 41.1 ± 5.6 months. The mean MINORS score was 12 ± 4. RESULTS: Active ROM improved for forward flexion (mean change 47° to 82°; MCID 12°), abduction (mean change 43° to 80°; MCID 7°), external rotation (mean change 8° to 39°; MCID 3°), and internal rotation (mean change -2 to 1 points). PROM scores also improved, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean change 20 to 50; MCID 20.9 points), Constant score (mean change 28 to 40; MCID 5.7 points), Simple Shoulder Test score (mean change 3 to 7; MCID 2.4 points), and VAS score (mean change -1.8 to -4.9; MCID -1.6 points). The proportion of shoulders with complications ranged from 0% (0 of 44) to 21% (30 of 140), and the proportion of shoulders with scapular notching ranged from 0% (0 of 76) to 29% (41 of 140). The proportion of patients undergoing revision ranged from 0% (0 of 44) to 13% (10 of 76) at short-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Lateralized RSA is a reasonable alternative to medialized implants for patients with rotator cuff insufficiency because it might reduce the likelihood of scapular notching without apparently compromising PROMs or ROM. More studies are required to determine whether there is a direct correlation between the amount of lateralization and PROMs or ROM.

Cartilage Restoration of Patellofemoral Lesions: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to systematically analyze the postoperative clinical, functional, and imaging outcomes, complications, reoperations, and failures following patellofemoral cartilage restoration surgery. METHODS: This review was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to August 31, 2018, to identify clinical studies that assessed surgical outcomes of patellofemoral cartilage restoration surgery. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess study quality. RESULTS: Forty-two studies were included comprising 1,311 knees (mean age of 33.7 years and 56% males) and 1,309 patellofemoral defects (891 patella, 254 trochlear, 95 bipolar, and 69 multiple defects, including the patella or trochlea) at a mean follow-up of 59.2 months. Restoration techniques included autologous chondrocyte implantation (56%), particulated juvenile allograft cartilage (12%), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (9%), osteochondral autologous transplantation (9%), and osteochondral allograft transplantation (7%). Significant improvement in at least one score was present in almost all studies and these surpassed the minimal clinically important difference threshold. There was a weighted 19%, 35%, and 6% rate of reported complications, reoperations, and failures, respectively. Concomitant patellofemoral surgery (51% of patients) mostly did not lead to statistically different postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSION: Numerous patellofemoral restoration techniques result in significant functional improvement with a low rate of failure. No definitive conclusions could be made to determine the best surgical technique since comparative studies on this topic are rare, and treatment choice should be made according to specific patient and defect characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

Is Bony Morphology and Morphometry Associated With Degenerative Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To scope the scientific literature and analyze the influence of bony risk factors for degenerative full-thickness primary rotator cuff tear. METHODS: A systematic review of databases PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed up to June 30, 2018. Meta-analysis was performed with mean difference (MD) or risk ratio for degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff injury, and when there were ≥3 studies for the considered potential risk factor. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: We analyzed 34 studies comprising 5,916 shoulders (3,369 shoulders with rotator cuff tear and 2,546 controls) and identified 19 potential risk factors for degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. There was moderate evidence that a higher critical shoulder angle (MD = 4.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43 to 5.39), higher acromion index (MD = 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.09), and lower lateral acromion angles (MD = -7.11, 95% CI -8.32 to -5.90) were associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears compared with controls. Moderate evidence showed that a type III acromion significantly increases the risk for full-thickness degenerative rotator cuff tear (risk ratio = 2.26, 95% CI 1.38 to 3.70). CONCLUSION: There is moderate evidence that larger critical shoulder angle, higher acromion index, lower lateral acromion angles, and a type III acromion are significantly associated with degenerative full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Other potential risk factors identified showed insufficient evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

Acetabular retroversion: Diagnosis and treatment.

Acetabular retroversion (AR) consists of a malorientation of the acetabulum in the sagittal plane. AR is associated with changes in load transmission across the hip, being a risk factor for early osteoarthrosis. The pathophysiological basis of AR is an anterior acetabular hyper-coverage and an overall pelvic rotation.The delay or the non-diagnosis of AR could have an impact in the overall management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). AR is a subtype of (focal) pincer deformity.The objective of this review was to clarify the pathophysiological, diagnosis and treatment fundaments inherent to AR, using a current literature review.Radiographic evaluation is paramount in AR: the cross-over, the posterior wall and ischial spine signs are classic radiographic signs of AR. However, computed tomography (CT) evaluation permits a three-dimensional characterization of the deformity, being more reliable in its recognition.Acetabular rim trimming (ART) and periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) are the best described surgical options for the treatment of AR.The clinical outcomes of both techniques are dependent on the correct characterization of existing lesions and adequate selection of patients. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:595-603. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180015.